League backing for Newcastle in Owen row

The Premier League have backed Newcastle's claim for compensation from the Football Association for the injury Michael Owen suffered while on England duty.

The Premier League have backed Newcastle's claim for compensation from the Football Association for the injury Michael Owen suffered while on England duty.

Owen has spent the last 10 months on the sidelines after rupturing his anterior cruciate ligament during the World Cup finals clash with Sweden last June.

Two operations in America left him facing a long haul back to fitness with Newcastle insisting he would not be rushed back as they fought for compensation for his loss.

Owen is on the brink of making his comeback although Sunday's match against Chelsea has come too soon.

Newcastle have received about £6m (€8.8m) from Soho Square, their own insurers and FIFA in compensation and to cover Owen's £110,000(€161,852)-a-week wages.

But chairman Freddy Shepherd has threatened to bring legal action against the FA to recoup the £150,000 (€220,708) the club have paid to restore the 27-year-old to full fitness.

The dispute has been described as a "test case" by Premier League chairman Dave Richards, who told The Times newspaper: "I think Freddy Shepherd is very, very justified in asking for certain things.

"It is something that needs sorting out in the game. I ask: 'Who has suffered out of this?' Well, Michael Owen has, but Newcastle United have as well because they have not had his services and someone has got to pay for that.

"I think Mr Shepherd is justified in saying this is what we've got to do. I think it is a real test case.

"I think it is a shame that football has to get itself in this position, when it is not difficult for the FA and Newcastle to get together to sort this out outside the media.

"But Mr Shepherd and Newcastle are one of our members and obviously they have the support of the Premier League."

"If you worked for an employer and they paid you 52 weeks a year and someone came along and said: 'I am going to take him for 10 weeks, but you have got to carry on paying him and I'll pay him as well' - where should that money go? Should it go to the employer or to the player who would then get 62 weeks' pay a year instead of 52? That's the scenario we need to look at."

more courts articles

Former DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson arrives at court to face sex charges Former DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson arrives at court to face sex charges
Case against Jeffrey Donaldson to be heard in court Case against Jeffrey Donaldson to be heard in court
Defendant in Cobh murder case further remanded in custody Defendant in Cobh murder case further remanded in custody

More in this section

Fulham v Crystal Palace - Premier League - Craven Cottage Jeffrey Schlupp celebrates late wondergoal as Crystal Palace earn point at Fulham
Newcastle United v Sheffield United - Premier League - St. James' Park Alexander Isak scores twice as Newcastle relegate Sheffield United with big win
Wolverhampton Wanderers v Luton Town - Premier League - Molineux Stadium Luton’s hopes of avoiding relegation further hit following loss to Wolves
Sport Push Notifications

By clicking on 'Sign Up' you will be the first to know about our latest and best sporting content on this browser.

Sign Up
Sport
Newsletter

Latest news from the world of sport, along with the best in opinion from our outstanding team of sports writers

Sign up
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited