Sean Quinn fails to turn up in High Court for proceedings over alleged trespass

Sean Quinn Fails To Turn Up In High Court For Proceedings Over Alleged Trespass
High Court proceedings aimed at preventing former billionaire Sean Quinn from allegedly trespassing on lands owned by the group of companies he set up were adjourned. PA Images
Share this article

High court reporters

High Court proceedings aimed at preventing former billionaire Sean Quinn from allegedly trespassing on lands owned by the group of companies he set up were adjourned after the businessman failed to turn up in court.

In a letter emailed to the court, Mr Quinn said he was unable to attend due to the short notice of the proceedings, but did offer an undertaking not to visit property owned by Mannok Quarries.


However, he said he requires access to a certain roadway that connects a quarry in Co Cavan owned by the plaintiffs to a cement factory.

Alleged trespass

Earlier this week lawyers for Mannok Cement Limited and Mannok Build Ltd told the Court that Mr Quinn is allegedly trespassing on a quarry owned by the companies.

They wanted an injunction restraining Mr Quinn from further alleged trespassing, on the grounds at Swanlinbar Quarry in Co Cavan.

The companies claim that on several occasions since late 2019 Mr Quinn has allegedly trespassed on their lands.


The most recent trespass, it is claimed occurred on May 8th last when he was seen driving on its lands, in his E class Mercedes-Benz,  including at Swanlinbar Quarry.

The firms, represented by Andrew Fitzpatrick SC and Michael Binchy Bl claim that the lands are active industrial sites, where heavy machinery is being operated, and Mr Quinn's alleged presence amounts to a significant health and safety risk.

The companies secured permission to serve short notice of the injunction proceedings on Mr Quinn at his home at Greaghrahan, Ballyconnell, Co Cavan. 

Not present

When the case returned before the court on Friday Mr Justice Alexander Owens was told by Mr Fitzpatrick that Mr Quinn was neither present nor represented in court.


The Judge said he had received an email from Mr Quinn stating that he was unable to attend "due to the short notice," he was given regarding the action.

Mr Fitzpatrick said his clients are "sceptical" about the contents of Mr Quinn's letter but were not seeking the injunction at this stage of the proceedings.

Mr Justice Owens agreed to adjourn the application to a date next week.

In the letter Mr Quinn, who apologised for not attending, said he was prepared to give an undertaking if he could access a road built by him 20 years ago that links Swanlinbar quarry to a cement factory.


The road was built on lands owned by parties including local farmers, who he said had leased it back to him.

He said the road is used by Coillte, local turf cutters, farmers and by windfarm operators.

He said he required access for business reasons, as he has an interest "in limestone land" on the Swanlinbar side of the mountain.


He also required access to the road because he is "in discussions with investors" and local landowners regarding the building of a new windfarm on the mountain.


He said he did not accept certain claims made by Mannok, including that his presence amounted to a health and safety risk.

He said he knew the property like "the back of my hand". The sites he said were closed and there were not moving vehicles.

Mr Quinn added that the case could be resolved without "further troubling the court" adding that he had abided with a previous undertaking given to a Belfast Court not to enter onto lands owned by the plaintiffs in Northern Ireland.

He was happy to provide a undertaking not to visit sites owned by Mannok as long as his access to the roadway was not inhibited.

The plaintiffs claim Mr Quinn has no right or interest in the lands and has no defence to the claims against him.

The firms say they are not entirely certain what is the purpose of Mr Quinn's alleged trespasses.

They believe his actions amount to "a misguided form of aggression in the form of defiance" aimed towards the company's management.

The firm's directors fear that unless restrained by the court his trespassing will continue. 

The two companies are subsidiaries of Mannok Holdings DAC, which was formerly Quinn Industrial Holdings DAC/Quinn Group/Aventas Group and is part of the Mannok group which specialises in the sale and supply of building products and packaging solutions.

Read More

Message submitting... Thank you for waiting.

Want us to email you top stories each lunch time?

Download our Apps
© 2024, developed by Square1 and powered by