Bailey appeals extradition to France

A fresh appeal launched by Ian Bailey against his extradition order to France in connection with the killing of French film maker Sophie Toscan du Plantier has got underway.

A fresh appeal launched by Ian Bailey against his extradition order to France in connection with the killing of French film maker Sophie Toscan du Plantier has got underway.

The Supreme Court heard arguments from Bailey’s senior counsel Garrett Simons, who claimed that the French legal system has no right to exercise authority over the case in Ireland.

He argued that France should not be able to extradite a citizen from a third country in a case where, if reversed, Ireland could not do the same in France.

British-born Bailey is wanted for questioning by an investigating judge in France in connection with the murder of Sophie Toscan du Plantier in Schull, Co Cork in 1996.

He has continued to deny any involvement in the 39-year-old’s death and has never been prosecuted.

The 54-year-old former journalist is a British citizen. His counsel Mr Simons argued that in the hypothetical case of a British citizen allegedly murdering an Irish citizen in France, Ireland would not have the power to extradite him.

He said the appeal was based on the idea of reciprocity, as defined under section 44 of the of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003.

“Section 44 sets out and recognises the principle of reciprocity where a state is not required to extradite somebody to another state in circumstances where the reverse situation where the reverse state would not have a right to prosecute,” said Mr Simons.

But senior counsel for the state Robert Barron argued that the principal of reciprocity is not part of the framework of the Act in question.

Mr Simons added that Irish law is centred on the citizenship of the accused, while French law focusses on the citizenship of the victim. He said there was no reciprocity between the states and the accused cannot be extradited.

These arguments were outlined before the High Court last March, when Bailey’s extradition was ordered.

But it is believed fresh evidence is to emerge during the Supreme Court appeal this week in connection with local Garda officers allegedly mishandling the initial investigation following the discovery of Ms Toscan du Plantier’s body near her holiday home in Schull.

Bailey’s lawyers said documents they received from the State last November show that the Garda investigation was botched, meaning France’s grounds to request an extradition are unfounded.

The documents include comments from former Director of Public Prosecutions Eamonn Barnes, the serving director when the decision not to prosecute Mr Bailey for murder was made.

He described the investigation as prejudiced.

Mr Simons is expected to present a statement from Attorney General Maire Whelan, in which she described Mr Barnes’ claims as significant.

more courts articles

Rebekah Vardy’s barrister ‘worked on Christmas Day’ for Wagatha case, court told Rebekah Vardy’s barrister ‘worked on Christmas Day’ for Wagatha case, court told
Nine people appear in court over protest outside refugee centre in Dublin Nine people appear in court over protest outside refugee centre in Dublin
DUP calls for measures to prevent Northern Ireland from becoming 'magnet' for asylum seekers DUP calls for measures to prevent Northern Ireland from becoming 'magnet' for asylum seekers

More in this section

Vaping and smoking study 20% of young people in addiction services have taken legal drug sold in vapes
Drug testing of drivers at road crashes to become compulsory from this weekend Drug testing of drivers at road crashes to become compulsory from this weekend
CC HSE BUILDING Data protection commissioners 'want to look wider' into patient file breach
War_map
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited