Man appeals 12-year sentence for defiling two teenage girls

Man Appeals 12-Year Sentence For Defiling Two Teenage Girls Man Appeals 12-Year Sentence For Defiling Two Teenage Girls
The 31-year-old, who cannot be named to protect the identity of his victims, pleaded guilty to defilement of two girls, aged 14 and 16, on various dates in 2017 and 2018 at Mullingar Circuit Criminal Court in November 2019.
Share this article

Seán McCárthaigh

A “cunning” abuser who plied two young teenage girls with drugs before defiling them at his apartment in a midlands town has appealed against the severity of a lengthy jail term imposed for the offences.

The 31-year-old male was sentenced to 12 years in prison at a sitting of Mullingar Circuit Criminal Court in November 2019 with the final three years suspended.

The appellant, who cannot be identified to protect the identity of his victims, had pleaded guilty to the defilement of a 14-year-old girl under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006 on dates between September 1st, 2018 and November 24th, 2018 at his apartment.

He also pleaded guilty to a similar offence involving a 16-year-old girl on dates between May 1st, 2017-July 22nd, 2017 at the same location.

The man subsequently pleaded guilty to further two counts of meeting a child for the purpose of sexual exploitation in relation to the same two victims.

Social media


Evidence in the case heard how the man met his younger victim on a number of occasions when he contacted her via Snapchat and Instagram to persuade her to come to his apartment with the offer of free drugs including cannabis, ecstasy and cocaine before defiling her at some of their meetings.

The older victim indicated she consented to engaging in sexual activity with the appellant.

Counsel for the man, Colman FitzGerald SC, claimed the headline sentence of 14 years fixed by the sentencing judge, Judge Keenan Johnson, was “too high.”

Mr FitzGerald said his client was not in a position of authority over the girls and he had not engaged in any deliberate isolating behaviour.

Opposing appeal

He claimed the evidence lacked many of the egregious aggressive factors of other similar cases such as insidiously inveigling his way into a position of trust with his victims.

Opposing the appeal, counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), John Hayden SC, said the headline sentence of 14 years was justified on the established facts of the case which were rightly categorised by Judge Johnson as being in the “mid to upper range”.

Mr Hayden said there were multiple aggravating factors including the appellant’s use of drugs.

He said there was evidence that the offender had taken a picture and video of sexual encounters with one of his victims.

Video news
Video: Phased approach to reopening indoor dining;...
Read More

Mr Hayden said the man had exercised clear power over his two victims and had acted in a premeditated fashion using social media to contact his victims.

The DPP argued he was fully aware of the girls’ ages and acted “in a cunning, manipulative and grossly offensive manner”.

The Court of Appeal, with Mr Justice Séamus Woulfe presiding with Mr Justice Patrick McCarthy and Ms Justice Isobel Kennedy, said it would issue its ruling in the case on Friday.

Read More

Want us to email you top stories each lunch time?

Download our Apps
© 2022, developed by Square1 and powered by