Many arrested but few charged in US terror probe

When the FBI came knocking on his door, Malek Zeidan wasn’t worried.

When the FBI came knocking on his door, Malek Zeidan wasn’t worried.

The 44-year-old doughnut shop worker had been living in northern New Jersey for 14 years, his only brush with the law a traffic ticket years earlier. So he didn’t think twice when federal agents sought to question his roommate in a possible marriage fraud case.

While they were there, they asked Zeidan about his own immigration status, and he candidly admitted he had overstayed his visa. They asked him to talk with immigration officials.

He did, was promptly arrested and detained for 40 days, becoming one of the more than 1,100 people, mostly Muslims from Arab, Middle Eastern or southern Asian nations, who were held on immigration charges while authorities tried to determine whether they were terrorists.

A year later, most of the detainees have been released. Only a handful have been charged with crimes, none relating to the September 11 attacks.

Free on bail while fighting deportation back to Syria, Zeidan, like many others, is struggling with the new realities of life in America, still trying to understand how he became part of the largest criminal investigation in US history.

"I went to jail for nothing," he said. "If you did something wrong, then you go to jail, and I don’t have any sympathy for you. But I didn’t do anything. Other countries put you in jail for no reason, but I never thought it could happen here."

It is a common refrain among detainees and their families. Most came to the United States in search of a better life, working menial, low-paying jobs. Almost all overstayed tourist visas. Before September 11, such an infraction was widely ignored by federal authorities.

But after the attacks, it became a tool to hold suspects indefinitely while the FBI tried to determine if they were involved with or knew anything about Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida terrorist network.

Attorney General John Ashcroft defends the detentions, and the secrecy surrounding them, as crucial to preventing future terrorist attacks.

"Our most important objective is to save innocent lives from further acts of terrorism by identifying, disrupting, and dismantling terrorist networks," he said in a speech last month.

"Like many Americans, I am concerned about the expansion of preventative law enforcement. Each and every person detained arising from our investigation into 9/11 has been detained under the law, with an individualised predicate - a criminal charge, an immigration violation, or a judicially issued material witness warrant," Ashcroft said. "We have not engaged, nor will we engage, in preventive detention."

But immigrant and civil liberties advocates say the detentions were too convenient.

"We are selectively enforcing our immigration laws, and there is a vengeance to it," said Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the Newark chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, which is battling the government in two cases involving detainee secrecy.

All but 74 of the detainees had been released as of August 9, according to the most recent accounting from the Justice Department.

The government for months refused to release the detainees’ names or other basic information about them, and directed courts to close many of their hearings to the public. On August 3 a federal judge ordered the government to release the names of detainees - including those already set free - but later stayed her order to give government lawyers more time to appeal.

The judge rejected arguments by the US Justice Department that releasing the names could endanger national security by alerting terrorist groups to who is - or is not - being held.

In addition, the ACLU and two New Jersey newspapers are challenging the closed hearings. The US Supreme Court granted the Bush administration an emergency stay that prevents the court hearings from being opened until a federal appeals court can examine the issue more thoroughly in September.

Zeidan also fought back, suing to open his immigration hearing. Quickly after the suit was filed, he was allowed to go free on a €10,000 bond.

These days he drives an ice cream truck from early morning until late at night, selling fudge pops and strawberry shortcake bars at 65p each in a losing attempt to pay his mounting bills, including fees from three lawyers.

Zeidan is single and has no close relatives in the United States except for some cousins. He figures he has a 50-50 chance of being sent back to Syria. Yet even despite his disillusionment with his detention, he still wants to stay here.

"We love the freedom in this country," he said. "That’s why we came here."

more courts articles

Former DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson arrives at court to face sex charges Former DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson arrives at court to face sex charges
Case against Jeffrey Donaldson to be heard in court Case against Jeffrey Donaldson to be heard in court
Defendant in Cobh murder case further remanded in custody Defendant in Cobh murder case further remanded in custody

More in this section

Dam collapse in Kenya kills 40, officials say Dam collapse in Kenya kills 40, officials say
Pair of giant pandas set to travel from China to San Diego Zoo Pair of giant pandas set to travel from China to San Diego Zoo
Teenagers plotted to attack Jewish people after Sydney stabbing, police say Teenagers plotted to attack Jewish people after Sydney stabbing, police say
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited