Winona Ryder stopped at other stores, judge told

The jury in the Saks trial convicted her on Thursday of grand theft and vandalism - the vandalism charge for cutting sensor tags off goods. The charges carry a maximum sentence of three years in prison, but Ryder, who will be sentenced on December 6, is expected to receive community service.

Jurors did not hear about Ryder’s earlier alleged incidents.

The transcripts showed that Deputy District Attorney Ann Rundle argued during a closed hearing on October 24 that jurors should hear about Ryder’s alleged "prior bad acts" in judging her behaviour at Saks.

She said the three incidents, two of them recorded on security videotapes, showed Ryder behaving very similarly to the way she was seen on the videotape from Saks.

"In one of our prior instances, she was seen by security selecting a hat, wandering around the store with a hat and then walking out the door with the hat on her head without paying for it," Rundle said, "which is an almost identical act to what she is being charged with in this case."

Rundle told the judge: "We have videotapes of two prior instances wherein she is seen doing the identical conduct that they will see on the video in our case ... selecting items, concealing those items underneath heavy garment bags or underneath her own clothing, in and out of dressing rooms and ultimately walking out of the store without paying for the item."

She said the instances occurred at Barneys on May 14 2000, and on October 10 2001, and November 29 at Neiman Marcus.

Ryder was detained by security guards at the Beverly Hills Saks Fifth Avenue on December 12 2001, after she left the store with more than €6000 worth of merchandise she had not paid for.

According to the transcripts, Rundle argued that each prior act was close in time to the date of her arrest and "each of these acts is relevant to refute the defence that this was merely a mistake".

Rundle said she wanted to use the prior acts to head off a defence argument that Ryder thought she had paid for the items.

"Given that defence, the people are entitled ... to refute that defence by introducing prior bad acts which show a lack of mistake," she said. "They also show a very common plan or scheme in how Ms Ryder perpetrates her thefts."

Rundle noted that in the Saks case Ryder would be seen on videotape selecting a hat, wearing it around the store, in and out of dressing rooms, and then placing the hat in her shopping bag as she walked out the door.

Ryder’s lawyer, Mark Geragos, argued against admission of the incidents.

"She’s never been detained. She’s never been arrested. I’ve watched the videotape. There’s nothing on the videotape," Geragos said, claiming the prosecution was just trying to "throw in more garbage" because it had a weak case.

Superior Court Judge Elden Fox ruled that the evidence could not be admitted at the trial because it would be "far more prejudicial than probative".

How those stores and Ryder resolved the incidents was not stated in the transcripts.

The judge released the transcripts of secret hearings in response to an appeals court decision in a case brought by The Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles Daily Journal.

Geragos could not comment last night, because he had not yet been informed that the documents were no longer under seal.