Judgement reserved in Denis O'Brien's action over Dáil statements

Businessman Denis O'Brien wants the Supreme Court to make findings that would be "entirely destructive" of, and would "effectively undermine", parliamentary speech, the State has argued before the court.

Judgement reserved in Denis O'Brien's action over Dáil statements

By Ann O'Loughlin

Businessman Denis O'Brien wants the Supreme Court to make findings that would be "entirely destructive" of, and would "effectively undermine", parliamentary speech, the State has argued before the court.

Maurice Collins SC said Mr O'Brien has brought proceedings arising out of utterances in the Dáil about his banking affairs by Social Democrats TD Catherine Murphy and Sinn Fein TD Pearse Doherty that would indirectly substitute the courts instead of the Dáil as the arbiter of "appropriate or inappropriate" parliamentary speech.

The proceedings were brought over the manner in which the Dáil Committee on Procedure and Privilege (CPP) handled and dismissed Mr O'Brien's complaint over the TDs' statements, made in May and June 2015, he said. The statements were made after Mr O'Brien got injunctions against RTE restrainiNg it publishing information about his banking affairs with State owned IBRC.

The CPP is an agent, and made up of, members of the Oireachtas, he said. Article 15 of the Constitution, which immunises parliamentary speech from legal action, means any decision of the Committee cannot be challenged in court.

All decisions by the CPP are "non-justiciable" and any attempt to have its findings reviewed by a court breaches the separation of powers.

In his submissions on behalf of the CPP, Michael Collins SC said any finding that the committee's decisions could be the subject of court actions meant any protection it had under Article 15 was "wholly illusionary".

In bringing his proceedings against over the CPP decision, Mr O'Brien was seeking to have the two TDs sanctioned for their statements, he argued.

In replying arguments for Mr O'Brien, Eileen Barrington SC said the State respondents were making "a stark case" which her client, who was directly affected by "an abuse of privilege", rejected.

Counsel were making submissions on the second and final day of Mr O'Brien's appeal against the High Court's dismissal of his case against the Oireachtas and the State over the statements made by the two TDs.

The Chief Justice, Mr Justice Frank Clarke, said the seven-judge court was reserving judgment. It may take some time before the court is in a position to deliver judgment, he added.

more courts articles

Football fan given banning order after mocking Munich air disaster Football fan given banning order after mocking Munich air disaster
Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother
Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van

More in this section

Speeding motorists targeted as national Slow Down Day begins Speeding motorists targeted as national Slow Down Day begins
Stardust nightclub fire Timeline of events in 40-year campaign by Stardust families
WHO teams up with 500 experts to define transmission of diseases spread 'through the air' WHO teams up with 500 experts to define transmission of diseases spread 'through the air'
War_map
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited