Bailey claims wrongful arrest has made his life a misery

A hugely anticipated lawsuit is set to begin tomorrow over Ian Bailey’s claims that he was wrongly arrested over the murder of a French film-maker in Ireland almost two decades ago.

Bailey claims wrongful arrest has made his life a misery

A hugely anticipated lawsuit is set to begin tomorrow over Ian Bailey’s claims that he was wrongly arrested over the murder of a French film-maker in Ireland almost two decades ago.

Sophie Toscan du Plantier was beaten to death on a freezing night outside her holiday home on a remote west Cork hillside on December 23, 1996.

Ian Bailey, 57, a former freelance journalist originally from the Manchester area, was arrested twice over the 39-year-old’s murder, but never prosecuted.

The killing remains unsolved and Mr Bailey is suing for wrongful arrest.

Mr Bailey claims his life has been a misery for 18 years after Gardaí allegedly manufactured evidence against him for the murder.

Mr Bailey's barrister Tom Creed said he will claim he has suffered emotional and psychological damage as a result of this allegedly unlawful and oppressive conduct intentionally inflicted by the gardaí.

The High Court civil action in Dublin could run for more than six weeks.

After the jury of eight men and four women was sworn in, Judge John Hedigan said he wanted to give them a “heads-up” and “gentle warnings”.

“The judge decides the law,” he said.

“These are the fundamentals of the jury trial. The judge decides the law, the jury decides the facts. Everyone is bound by the judge’s decision on the law.

“The judge is a kind of referee. I’m here to ensure that it is conducted fairly and in accordance with the law.”

On the eve of the first day of evidence at the Four Courts, Judge Hedigan told the jury not to research the case on the internet, not to read media reports of the hearings and not to discuss the case with anyone.

He urged them to respect each other’s views, listen carefully to witness testimony and to keep an open mind until the end.

“The parties and the court rely upon you to bring your own experience of life and common sense to bear,” Judge Hedigan said.

“Take your time, have confidence in yourselves to make the decisions.

“It’s to your own experience and common sense that we look to you to make a decision on the facts.”

Judge Hedigan told the jury they are required to bring in a verdict on the balance of probabilities.

more courts articles

Football fan given banning order after mocking Munich air disaster Football fan given banning order after mocking Munich air disaster
Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother
Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van

More in this section

Stardust nightclub fire inquest Jury in the Stardust inquests ‘very close’ to reaching verdicts
DCU Centre for Climate and Society annual conference Mary Robinson: Spend money on climate now or our future will be more grim
Drizzly days ahead before dry and sunny weekend Drizzly days ahead before dry and sunny weekend
War_map
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited