Hotel 'fines' guests for bad review

A couple have claimed they were charged an extra £100 (€125) by a hotel after leaving an online review describing it as a “filthy, stinking hovel”.

Hotel 'fines' guests for bad review

A couple have claimed they were charged an extra £100 (€125) by a hotel after leaving an online review describing it as a “filthy, stinking hovel”.

Tony and Jan Jenkinson said they were hit with the “fine” after leaving highly critical comments about the Broadway Hotel in Blackpool, England, on TripAdvisor.

They stopped at the hotel on their way to Oxford, paying £36 (€45) for a night in a double room.

But they said they encountered a string of problems, prompting Mr Jenkinson to post the review on August 30 in which he branded the hotel a “filthy, dirty, rotten, stinking hovel”.

The Jenkinsons said they discovered the £100 charge on their credit card statement a few days later.

When they queried the charge, they were said to have been told it was incurred under a “no bad review policy” included in the terms and conditions.

The policy said: “Despite the fact that repeat customers and couples love our hotel, your friends and family may not. For every bad review left on any website, the group organiser will be charged a maximum £100 per review.”

The couple, from Whitehaven in Cumbria, are attempting to recoup the money through their credit card company.

They complained to Cumbria trading standards officials, who have passed the matter to counterparts in Blackpool.

John Greenbank, trading standards area manager north, said: “I have worked for trading standards for many years and have never seen anything like this.

“The hotel management clearly thinks that they have come up with a novel way to prevent bad reviews. However, we believe this could be deemed an unfair trading practice.”

Councillor John McCreesh said: “Customers need to be free to be honest about the service they’re getting.

“Other customers depend upon it. Hotel owners should focus on getting their service right rather than shutting down aggrieved customers with threats and fines.

“People should have the right to vent their disappointment if a hotel stay did not meet their expectations and should not be prevented from having their say.”

Simon Calder, travel editor at The UK's Independent newspaper, told BBC Breakfast the incident was “completely out of order” but added: “I must say, of course, there is an element of you get what you pay for.”

The hotel could not be reached for comment. Its website appeared to be down.

more courts articles

Football fan given banning order after mocking Munich air disaster Football fan given banning order after mocking Munich air disaster
Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother Man (25) in court charged with murdering his father and attempted murder of mother
Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van Man appears in court charged with false imprisonment of woman in van

More in this section

Kenya’s military chief dies in helicopter crash Kenya’s military chief dies in helicopter crash
Long-lost first model of Star Trek’s USS Enterprise finally returned home Long-lost first model of Star Trek’s USS Enterprise finally returned home
Thousands evacuated and tsunami alert issued after Indonesian volcano eruption Thousands evacuated and tsunami alert issued after Indonesian volcano eruption
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited