Harvard punishes exam cheats

The inquiry started after a teaching assistant in a spring semester undergraduate-level government class detected problems in the take-home test, including that students may have shared answers.

In a campus-wide email yesterday, Faculty of Arts and Sciences dean Michael Smith said the school’s academic integrity board had resolved all the cases related to the cheating probe.

He said “somewhat more than half” of the cases involved students who had to withdraw from the college for a period of time.

Harvard said that the length of a student’s suspension period was usually from two to four terms.

Of the cases left, about half the students received disciplinary probation. The rest were not disciplined.

Some athletes became ensnared, including two basketball team co-captains whom the school scratched from its team roster in the wake of the cheating investigation.

Past reports in The Harvard Crimson also linked football, baseball and hockey players to the scandal.

Mr Smith said in the email that the school would not discuss specific student cases. A school spokesman, citing student privacy, would not say if any athletes had withdrawn or say which teams might have been affected.

The dean said a school committee was working on recommendations to strengthen a culture of academic honesty and promote ethics in scholarship.

“This is a time for communal reflection and action,” he wrote. “We are responsible for creating the community in which our students study and we all thrive as scholars.”

Staples founder Thomas Stemberg, a Harvard graduate whose son is a student, criticised the school’s handling of the probe.

“If you challenge the entire faculty at the Harvard Business School and the Harvard Law School to come up with a process that took more time, cost more money, embarrassed more innocent students, and vindicated guilty faculty ... that could not have outdone the process that took place,” he said yesterday.

Mr Stemberg, a supporter of Harvard’s basketball team, knows some of the students caught up in the scandal and his son knows others.

He wrote a letter of complaint to Harvard’s president in early January, claiming that the professor who taught the government class changed the rules after several exams in which “open collaboration” was encouraged.

He claimed that for the take-home exam in question, instructions to students said they could not collaborate with professors, teaching fellows “and others”.

“If the message was so clearly expressed, why did some of the teaching fellows go over the exam in open session...If they did not get the message, could one expect the students to understand it?” he said.

Mr Stemberg went on to say that while some students “went too far, literally cutting and pasting their answers”, others only wrote answers from notes “derived in the collaborative atmosphere the class encouraged”.

The class was known as Introduction to Congress, and widely seen on campus as an easy way to get a good grade.

Harvard Undergraduate Council president Tara Raghuveer said the cheating investigation had been a hot topic on campus for months. She said some students started the new school year without knowing if they would be allowed to finish it because of the lengthy period of time the probe took.

The 20-year-old junior also said there were a lot of questions about whether the take-home exam’s instructions were clear enough when it came to expectations about group work and both students and professors were now being careful to discuss collaboration policies.

Ms Raghuveer also said the school community should make an effort to embrace the suspended students when they came back to campus.

“The students who are implicated in this scandal from last spring still need to be recognised as members of our community ... They shouldn’t feel alienated from Harvard,” she said.

“This was an unfortunate incident. Students are being punished accordingly.”