No reasonable grounds for Newcastle United tax fraud suspicion, court told

No reasonable grounds exist for believing Newcastle United FC engaged in a suspected tax fraud, two High Court judges have been told.

No reasonable grounds for Newcastle United tax fraud suspicion, court told

No reasonable grounds exist for believing Newcastle United FC engaged in a suspected tax fraud, two High Court judges have been told.

Club officials are challenging the seizure of documents by tax officials investigating the financial affairs of several football clubs.

St James' Park and West Ham United's ground were raided in April by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) as part of a probe into suspected income tax and national insurance fraud.

Newcastle's managing director Lee Charnley was among a number of senior European football officials arrested and later released without charge.

The club is challenging the legality of the search-and-seize orders obtained by HMRC at Leeds Crown Court.

Richard Lissack QC, appearing for NUFC, said the warrants were "excessively wide", adding: "There were no reasonable grounds for believing Newcastle was engaged in suspected tax fraud."

The QC told Lord Justice Beatson and Mrs Justice Whipple, sitting in London, the warrants were also unnecessary because other methods were available for obtaining information.

Inaccurate and incomplete disclosure had also been given to the crown court, said Mr Lissack.

During the raids, business and financial records were seized as well as computers and mobile phones belonging to the club, who recently secured promotion to the Premier League.

The HMRC investigation centres on football agents and payments made in transfer dealings between English and French clubs.

It has confirmed the French authorities are assisting the UK investigation.

Court orders are preventing HMRC officers from examining the seized material pending the outcome of the club's two-day application for judicial review.

Mr Lissack also argued that the failure of the judge who granted the warrants to give reasons "should on its own lead to the warrants being quashed".

He said making search-and-seize orders was a draconian step which was "intrusive and interferes with the liberty of the subject".

He said persons affected had a right to know whether the law had been properly applied and followed.

Without proper reasons there was no clarity and no way of knowing, said Mr Lissack.

more courts articles

Squatters slowly filter out of Gordon Ramsay’s pub Squatters slowly filter out of Gordon Ramsay’s pub
Sun publisher loses bid to push back full trial of legal challenges Sun publisher loses bid to push back full trial of legal challenges
Woman who stalked Harry Styles jailed and banned from his performances Woman who stalked Harry Styles jailed and banned from his performances

More in this section

Dublin v Derry - Allianz Football League Division 1 Final Brian Fenton regrets reacting to 'hurtful, dangerous, kind of nasty' challenge against Derry
Clare v Limerick - Munster GAA Hurling Senior Championship Round 5 Declan Hannon wants to change Limerick's Ennis record
Irish Life Dublin Marathon 2023 Dublin Marathon to retain city centre start and finish

DALO'S HURLING SHOW LIVE

DALO'S HURLING SHOW LIVE

LIMERICK
The Castletroy Park Hotel. April 19 @ 7.30pm 

dalo headshot
ieStyle Live 2021 Logo
ieStyle Live 2021 Logo

IE Logo
Outdoor Trails

Discover the great outdoors on Ireland's best walking trails

IE Logo
Outdoor Trails

Sport
Newsletter

Latest news from the world of sport, along with the best in opinion from our outstanding team of sports writers

Sign up
Cookie Policy Privacy Policy Brand Safety FAQ Help Contact Us Terms and Conditions

© Examiner Echo Group Limited