Bush, Cheney 'directed campaign against Iraq war critics'
The White House today declined to challenge assertions that President George Bush authorised the leaks of intelligence information to counter US administration critics on Iraq.
But Bush’s spokesman, Scott McClellan, appeared to draw a distinction about Bush’s often-stated opposition to leaks.
“There is a difference between providing declassified information to the public when it’s in the public interest and leaking classified information that involved sensitive national intelligence regarding our security,” he said.
Court papers filed by the prosecutor in the CIA leak case against Lewis “Scooter” Libby said Bush authorised Libby to disclose information from a classified pre-war intelligence report.
The court papers say Libby’s boss, Vice President Dick Cheney, advised him that thePresident had authorised Libby to leak the information to the press in striking back at administration critic Joseph Wilson.
McClellan volunteered that the administration declassified information from the intelligence report – the National Intelligence Estimate – and released it to the public on July 18, 2003. But he refused to say when the information was actually declassified.
On July 18, 2003, McClellan said the information had been declassified that day. “It was officially declassified today,” he told reporters in a briefing in Dallas, Texas.
At the White House today, McClellan interpreted his own remarks to mean that the informaton had been offically releasedto the public.
The date could be significant because Libby discussed the information with a reporter 10 days earlier, on July 8 of that year.
Yesterday, disclosure of official authorisation for Libby’s leaks to reporters brought strong criticism from administration political enemies, but little likelihood that their demands for explanations will be met.
Senator John Kerry, citing Bush’s call two years ago to find the person who leaked the CIA identity of Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, said the latest disclosures meant the President needed to go no further than a mirror.
In his court filing, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald asserted that “the President was unaware of the role” that Libby “had in fact played in disclosing” Plame’s CIA status. The prosecutor gave no such assurance, though, regarding Cheney.
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said that “in light of today’s shocking revlation, President Bush must fully discose his participation in the selective leaking of classified information. The American people must know the truth.”
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said the President has the “inherent authority to decide who should have classified information”. The White House declined to comment, citing the ongoing criminal probe into the leak of Plame’s identity.
In July 2003, Wilson’s accusation that the Bush administration had twisted prewar intelligence to exaggerate the Iraqi threat “was viewed in the office of Vice President as a direct attack on the credibility of the Vice President, and the President”, Fitzgerald’s court papers stated.
Part of the counter-attack was a meeting on July 8, 2003 with New York Times reporter Judith Miller at which Libby discussed the contents of a then-classified CIA report that seemed to undercut what Wilson was saying in public.
Separately, Libby said he understood he also was to tell Miller that pre-war intelligence assessments had been that Iraq was “vigorously trying to procure” uranium, the prosecutor stated.
In the run-up to the war, Cheney had insisted Iraq was trying to build a nuclear bomb.
The conclusion on uranium was contained in a National Intelligence Estimate, a consensus document of the US intelligence community.
Libby’s statements came in grand jury testimony before he was charged with five counts of perjury, obstruction and lying to the FBI in the Plame probe.
Libby at first told the Vice President he could not have the July 8, 2003, conversation with Miller because of the classified nature of the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, Fitzgerald said.
Libby testified to the grand jury ”that the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorised defendan to disclose the relevant portions” of the NIE.
After Wilson began attacking the administration, Cheney had a conversation with Libby, expressing concerns on whethr a CIA-sponsored trip to the African nation of Niger by Wilson “was legitimate or whether it was in effect a junket set up by Mr Wilson’s wife”, Fitzgerald wrote.
The suggestion that Plame sent her husband on the Africa trip had widespread circulation among White House loyalists.
Wilson said he had conclude on his trip that it was highly doubtful Niger had sold uranium yellowcake to Iraq.
The prosecutor’s court papers offer a glimpse inside the White House when the Justice Department launched a criminal investigation of the Plame leak in September 2003.
Libby ”implored White House officials” to issue a statement saying he had not been involved in revealing Plame’s identity, and that when his initial efforts met with no success, he “sought the assistance of the vice president in having his name cleared,” the prosecutor stated.
The White House eventually said neither Libby nor Karl Rove had been involved in the leak. Rove remains under criminal investigation.
